Barger for US Senate

Official campaign website of Al Barger, 2004 Indiana Libertarian Party candidate for US Senate

Monday, August 30, 2004

Debate challenge

AN OPEN LETTER TO HOOSIER VOTERS AND INDIANA MEDIA:

Hello, my name is Albert Barger. I am the Libertarian Party candidate for US Senate from Indiana. I would like to challenge my electoral opponents Senator Evan Bayh and Marvin Scott to a series of open public debates.

The most basic act of democracy is to have the candidates vying for any public office face each other in public debate on the issues of the day so that voters can make a direct side-by-side comparison. This is exactly what we should do.

To that end, I urge Indiana media outlets, particularly radio and television stations, to offer us this opportunity. It needn’t be anything complicated. Just bring the three candidates into your studio, sit us down and ask us some questions. It needn’t be any trickier than that.

There’s no reason why we couldn’t have a dozen or more discussions or debates all around the state. This would give the public a good chance to find out what the candidates are all about. Sit us down, stand us up, one reporter or a panel, just us in a studio or bring in some average citizens asking questions in a town hall type setting or taking call-in questions on the radio.

It’s all good, and the best thing would probably be some of each. We face critical questions of war and peace, and a multi-trillion dollar federal budget. There’s plenty to talk about.

Now, I know that Senator Bayh is a busy man, a big important senator. However, he has no responsibility more pressing than coming home to face his opponents and explain to our constituents why he should be given another term in this critical position. What has he done to deserve re-election? Enquiring minds want to know, and it will take considerably more than a couple of photo op rallies to find out.

In deference to the senator’s position, I’d be perfectly happy for the media to make initial arrangements with Senator Bayh for when he can show up. I’ll gladly bend to his schedule and show up whenever and wherever he is available. Hopefully, Mr. Scott will be similarly flexible.

Certainly it would be particularly easy for Senator Bayh to do plenty of radio debates. He could absolutely phone those in if need be.

Perhaps the easiest and most personally advantageous and convenient approach would be for Senator Bayh to duck or minimize exposure to his lesser-known opponents, coasting to re-election on name recognition and monetary advantage.

Of course, the voters would be far better served by seeing the candidates stacked up side by side. Therefore, I urge media outlets to offer us this opportunity.

I also urge Hoosier voters to contact the Bayh campaign, and ask him to come out and talk to them.

Al Barger
Libertarian for US Senate

Thursday, August 19, 2004

"Social Security," the ultimate ripoff pyramid scheme

The supposed system of "Social Security" may constitute the biggest financial scam in human history - the biggest pyramid scheme ripoff ever. The very name of the program has an Orwellian tinge- meaning really exactly the opposite of what it implies, as this socialist program has done great damage to the actual financial security of our retirees.

Let's consider what retirement funds should look like, how Social Security actually works, it's history, outlook for the future, a better solution, and then some ideas on how to get from here to there.

WHAT RETIREMENT FUNDS SHOULD LOOK LIKE

Really, it's fairly simple. You take a part of your income each week and put it away. Without getting overly risky, you would expect to put it in bonds or basic mutual funds in the stock market, where the risk is spread across many companies in the mutual funds portfolio. Even if there's a dip in the market for a year or two (as has been the case recently), the market is always up over a period of years, and business goes on. That's because you're investing in the productivity of the whole economy and all the people in the companies in which you invest, who are being held to account in the market. You still own a piece of Halliburton or GE, even if the current cash value goes down for a minute or two.

Anyway, if the average factory or office worker put away the tenth part of their income in common low risk investments for 40+ years, they would have most of a million dollars built up. It's not voodoo economics or wishful thinking, just the basic logic of compound interest. Your savings becomes the backbone of the whole economy, providing basic seed money for building homes and businesses- and thus you get a cut of the harvest.

That's YOURS. You wouldn't be needing a Medicare drug benefit that the federal government has no way to pay for, or depend on hoping that Congress can raise money for you. It's yours by right, because you EARNED it. You've got money to live on, and money to pass on to your heirs.

HOW SOCIAL SECURITY ACTUALLY "WORKS"

The federal government managed to turn the simplest thing in the world into a huge, bankrupt unworkable disaster getting ready to happen. They've taken people's money for all their lives, and just blown it. They've turned hardworking retirees into welfare rats depending on Congress to take their money out of young people's hides.

Social Security FICA tax takes about 15% off the top of the average person's paycheck. That's half from you, and half from your employer- which is money they have to figure as wages to you.

Out of that, they pay skimpy benefits to current retirees, maybe as much as $1,000 a month. That's sure not much to live on, and not the half or even third of what you'd have if you had simply kept your money in the first place. Plus, you have no account to pass on when you die.

Social Security pays this pittance to current retirees, then they take every leftover penny and spend it - right now. There's no "lock box" as Al Gore talked about in 2000. There is NO Social Security trust fund. That $500 you paid last month in FICA taxes? Gone.

What do they do with it? It doesn't much matter. The feds might as well be buying crack rocks with your money and smoking them, cause the money is just as gone as if they had.

This leaves old folks dependent from month to month on the ability of the government to extract money from people working now, begging Congress for sustenance like welfare rats- despite having paid into the system all their lives. You may have been paying, but that money was not invested or even just saved under the mattress, and they only way YOU get anything is by the favor of Congress.

That favor of Congress also extends to SSI disability benefits, which add a big bunch of straight up welfare to the already untenable economic structure of Social Security. Blind and lame and mentally challenged or simply emotionally unstable citizens draw tends of billions of dollars from the till. This obviously does not help the economic viability of the system.

Note also that Congress does not HAVE to give you anything. A legitimate retirement fund is yours, and you have every right to cash in your accounts and get exactly what they're worth. Legally, though, Congress has no obligation to pay any particular amount of Social Security benefits.

Which is convenient, because soon they won't be able to. This is because the system has been run all along like a scam pyramid scheme. A classic financial pyramid scheme plays on a few people at the beginning of a setup making out good by taking the money from an exponentially increasing bunch of people under them. But as more and more people come in to the bottom, eventually there's no one left to recruit, and a bunch of people are left broke, having lost their money in schemes that had no inherent financial viability.

Likewise Social Security. Rather than safeguarding and investing your money, it's been turned over to the government and squandered. It's not accumulating interest and earnings. It's been smoked up like a crack rock. It's only worked as well as it has because of increasing populations coming up behind to pay. The boomers and Gen Xers are getting ready to find themselves holding the empty bag.

HISTORY OF SOCIAL SECURITY

When the Social Security scheme was started by Franklin Roosevelt in 1935, there were approximately 15 working people paying in for every one current retiree receiving benefits. It didn't take much to make it work with those kinds of numbers, and the modest amount given out in benefits.

Numbers were highly favorable, and continued on a favorable path because of the post World War II baby boom, which brought in yet more people to pay another generation of retiree benefits. That many people paying in, and with only modest benefits coming out the other end, the FICA taxes have generated far more money than has been paid out in benefits- even without the benefit of investment income and interest. We're somewhere near the top of that cycle now, with the baby boomers entering their late-career earnings peak.

We're getting ready to get slammed, though, and hard. This financial house of cards is ready to crumble. Social Security has unfunded liabilities for current and future retirees somewhere in the multiple TENS OF TRILLIONS of dollars - and not one red cent put away to pay any of it. Best current estimate I've seen suggests more than $26 trillion in Social Security liabilities alone, besides Medicare and Medicaid, etc.

Somewhere within about 12 - 15 years the FICA taxes coming in will be less month to month than the checks going out, the Social Security checks will start bouncing, and all hell's going to break loose. The federal government has been heavily subsidized for decades by simply writing IOUs to the supposed trust fund, and just spending the Social Security money - hundreds of billions of dollars every year. Before long, the incoming money not only won't provide hundreds of billions of dollars a year to subsidize the rest of the budget, but it won't even pay for current retirees.

When the baby boomers start retiring in mass over the next 20 years, we're going to get down to only about TWO people paying in for each retiree. How is that going to work, with no money saved?

No private company could get away with this. Enron nor WorldCom never mishandled investors money this grotesquely. Executives of these companies are quite properly being sent to prison for financial abuses not the tenth part as bad as Social Security.

By rights, every damned member of Congress -Republican and Democrat- should be doing a perp walk in front of the cameras on their way to penitentiaries for the financial fraud of Social Security - let alone anything else they're doing. Of course this won't happen, cause they're the ones making the laws. Besides, they're just doing it for The Children, or some such foolishness.

THE CURRENT SYSTEM, BEST CASE

Best case for the current system would be that Congress cuts benefits even below the already inadequate returns, raises the retirement age to squeeze a few more years of work and payments from the boomers, raise the crap out of the already exorbitant taxes- and pray for luck to limp the system by.

THE CURRENT SYSTEM, WORST CASE

If nothing is done to fix this mess, we're just going to have a train wreck. Congressmen can promise you anything, but if the money's not there, they can't give it out. Congress will just have to say, "Sorry, those other guys before us just screwed you. There's no money." Then they shrug their shoulders. Sorry about your bad luck. And you won't be able to just vote it away.

Something not far from that bad is not entirely unlikely, because reality is tough. You can't get blood from a turnip, and how are just two people going to cough up your thousand bucks a month- and pay their own bills and for the whole government besides?

SO WHAT THE HECK DO WE DO?

Right now, we've got just a few years where we can change course and head this big ship in a better direction. Any way we do it, people are going to get screwed. The quicker we start moving to a more viable model, the less bad the screwing.

The boomers are still working and paying in. If we let people start putting their supposed retirement money into their own accounts, there will be something there, and something to start earning some interest and dividends.

Exactly how to approach this gets complicated, and the parameters we're working in get more narrow and less appealing the longer we wait.

One simple way to start extracting us would be a cut-off that anyone under a fairly young age, say 25 or 30 be required to put away the 15% in their own private accounts. This should be an optional opt-out for older people. Obviously people who are near retirement age would prefer to keep what they've been promised, and there's some calculations for people in between as to what to do.

Even someone as old as 50 might would be better to cut their losses, figuring that keeping that 15% for their last 15 years in the workforce would give them at least that much real savings that will actually be there. Also, we could offer buyouts with private annuities to make those opt outs more attractive. Such things can be gotten relatively cheap, especially for younger people where the investors get more time to work with their lump payoff from today to make the money to pay the future annuities.

All of this is expensive (all the more reason to eliminate other unconstitutional programs such as the Department of Education and agricultural subsidies), but there's going to be a price for fixing this mess one way or another, and the sooner we start doing it, the cheaper it'll be and the sooner the old folks get the REAL security they deserve.

Then the younger people get to keep their own retirement money, investing it and not having it subject to governmental whim. If they take the same 15% out that has been taken in FICA, in the first place they will actually have something solid to show - not just empty government promises. Not only that, but they'll end up with at least several times what they would get from Social Security, even if they managed to actually pay as promised.

There's one main obvious legitimate objection to purely privatizing Social Security: Some people simply won't save. Then they get old, and we have to take care of them or let them starve in the streets- which we obviously aren't going to do.

To that end, it might be necessary to have a law requiring minimum private retirement savings. I'm not real thrilled with this on general principles. For one thing, that starts putting the government thumb on the market scales in deciding what constitutes a legitimate, qualified retirement investment. Plus, I'm less than thrilled with the government knowing your business to the extent that would be necessary to enforce this. Plus, how is the federal government qualified to run your retirement? They've fully and thoroughly proven just the opposite. There are probably several other good objections.

Nonetheless, something on this order might be a reasonable compromise. It would be likely to actually work. It would certainly work a lot better than the guaranteed disaster we have coming down the road otherwise. Old people wanting their retirement would no longer need to feel like they're taking the bread out of their children and grandchildren's mouths.


ONE MITIGATING NOTE

Fortunately, people tend to be smarter than government officials. Tens of millions of people have REAL retirement accounts, all those beautiful 401K plans and such. Those are real, and they're going to be there - if Congress doesn't come up with some clever way to tap them to fund their unfunded Social Security debts.

Cling to your 401Ks - they're your real social security.

Meanwhile, you might want to ask Senator Bayh and your local congressmen (Republicans and Democrats alike) what they've done during their time in office to stop this ridiculous squandering of YOUR life savings.

You might also ask them where in the US Constitution they find the authority for this program in the first place. Hint: the correct answer is "nowhere."

Tuesday, August 17, 2004

"It's Politics!" on WKWH, 8-16-2004

Rush County Republican chair John McCane and former Democrat chair Dick Malcom host "It's Politics!" Monday nights on WKWH radio out of Rushville, Indiana. They graciously invited me on the show on August 16.

John McCane is quite the man about town. He's one of those fellows who seems to know everyone. He's assertive, but very friendly about it.

Unlike some of the national Democrats, particularly their spiritual leader Michael Moore, this local Democrat was reasonable and balanced as a human being. He exhibited no signs of foaming at the mouth in rabid hatred of the president. In short, he seemed like the nice, friendly Hoosier he no doubt is.

Mr. Malcom also had the most interesting piece of counterargument in the program, defending unconstitutional federal governmental involvement in education. Dick Malcom argued that the federal government was justified in getting involved with education because of Jim Crow. Southerners simply were not going to educate black folk, so Uncle Sam HAD to step in. That apparently justifies the continuing existence of the Department of Education, even with no constitutional authority.

I'm still not buying it, but that was a little bit different argument than what I'd heard before, at least.

Anyhow, you can hear the whole extravaganza.
CLICK HERE for the 16MB 30 minutes, including hosts introductory remarks
CLICK HERE for the 11MB 21 minutes, just Al's part

Tuesday, August 10, 2004

Iraq connection to US terrorism

Opponents of our war effort in Iraq stress that the Hussein regime supposedly didn't have anything to do with Al Qaeda, and thus have no connection to attacking US. This really isn't true, in that there are at least lots of little ties to Al Qaeda.

Moreover, it's hard to gauge these things partly because these people generally don't have membership cards to give you for proof. They tend to purposely conceal member's names and minimize paper trails. That's part of the strategy.

HERE is one small thread, however, making a clear connection between activities in Iraq and terrorist plotting in America. The founder and the imam, Yassin Aref, of Masjid As-Salam mosque in Albany, New York were arrested in an FBI sting. They were plotting to help a terrorist (fortunately, an undercover FBI agent) assassinate the Pakistani ambassador in New York.

It's worth noting how we became aware of this crew. The imam's name was found in documents recovered a year ago in a terrorist training camp run by the Ansar al-Islam in Iraq.

Now, this guy seems to be relatively small potatoes. Catching him would not in itself be enough to justify the entire war effort.

However, with this in evidence, you can't say that there was no connection between the Hussein regime and terrorist plots against the US. This Aref jerk may not have been a card carrying member of Al Qaeda, but he was most definitely in the US trying to co-ordinate a terrorist attack.

Further, it seems reasonably likely that absent our invasion, this cockroach would have been recruiting some help from this Iraqi training facility. Also, we lucked out somewhat with finding his contact information. How many more such idiots have we got running around? Invading Iraq and shutting down their terrorist training camps and safe havens has likely disrupted the plans of a number of such people.

WMDs or no, this makes US a little bit safer.

Sunday, August 08, 2004

Ready for Correction

I was having a fine time Sunday afternoon campaigning on one of the most perfectly beautiful days ever on the northeast side of Indianapolis, near 38th and Arlington.

I particularly enjoyed talking with Jim Ramsey. Told that I was a Libertarian, his first association was nationally syndicated radio talk show host Neal Boortz. Yes, I said, he's pretty close to my way of thinking. He just spoke at our national convention.



Now, obviously Jim's a consumer of some right wing talk radio. However, in accordance with the best end of talk radio listeners, "consumer" probably isn't quite the right word. He disagrees with Boortz a lot of the time, and says he likes to argue back to the radio when he's listening. He's a man after my own heart. I know I've driven down the road cussing Limbaugh a time or six.

So, being in league with Neal Boortz doesn't necessarily mean that Mr. Ramsey's going to agree with me about everything. That's good. Anybody who agrees with anyone about everything probably isn't doing much critical thinking. What we need is not just to drag bunches of dumb warm bodies to polling places, but for the citizens to make actively thoughtful and informed choices.

So then, I will suggest to all my readers and constituents the same thing I did to Jim. Look through my campaign website (www.morethings.com/senate) and find something where you DISagree with me. Then write me a letter at barger4senate@gmail.com and tell me where I'm wrong. Please be as specific as possible, and tell me why.

It's always nice when people write me notes telling me how right I am. But heck, I already knew that. I don't learn anything that way.

Show me something where I'm wrong, or I've missed an important fact or consideration. You might actually learn me something. I'd like that.

Sunday, August 01, 2004

Just say no to an Indy light rail boondoggle

Various hacks, uh, I mean dedicated political and civic leaders have conjured up a big fat new boondoggle to build a light rail system between Indianapolis and the northern suburbs. This nonsense has the backing of the Indianapolis Regional Transportation Council and various mayors and city councilmen.

They're supposedly looking at spending $850 million to build something that might reduce traffic congestion on I-69 by maybe as much as 2%. That 2% is probably optimistic, and of course to get to the real price your best guess would be to drop another zero in there.

Naturally, when they come up a plan, they will be asking for federal money.

This is where I come in as a federal candidate. Let me say right now for the record that Senator Barger will absolutely oppose even one nickel of federal funding for this foolishness. We don't need our own Big Dig, like the infamous still not completed Boston project.

This kind of thing is exactly what is meant by corporate welfare. It would be great for the contractors, the bankers, the property speculators, etc. It would not do SQUAT for the taxpayers, except probably cause a lot of disruption with eminent domain and such, and of course empty their wallets.

Link Soup
morethings master photo gallery index MP3 new album releases lyrics sammy davis little richard photos buddy holly pictures fats domino images chuck berry pictures 01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ 06/ 07/ 08/ 09/ 10/ 11/ 12/ 01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ 06/ 07/ 08/ 09/ 10/ 11/ 12/ 01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ 06/ 07/ 08/ 09/ 10/ 11/ 12/ 01/02/  03/ 04/ 05/ 06/ 07/ 08/ 09/ 10/ 11/ 12 01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ 06/ 07/ 08/ 09/ 10/ 11/  12/01/ 02/ 03/ 04/ 05/ 06/ 07/ 08/ 09/ 10/  11/  12/08/ 09/ 10/ 11/ 12/ la 24 lucille ball images james blunt photos clint eastwood pictures lena horne images team america pictures robert mitchum photos bruce springsteen pictures  mariah carey pictures ann coulter photos george clooney images  loretta lynn pictures beatles pictures white stripes pictures andy griffith pictures kill bill pictures beverly hillbillies pictures robin williams frank zappa pictures jerry lee lewis pictures richard pryor photos june carter johnny cash pictures vic mackey shield pictures u2 photos four seasons images james cagney images elvis presley pictures country music blog dolly parton pictures olsen twins photos tom petty photos tori amos pictures joaquin phoenix images David Bowie photos Quills movie images reese witherspoon pictures rolling stones photos fiona apple images kim novak images ray charles photos marx brothers pictures prince rogers nelson pictures blazing saddles images  sinead o'connor images  eddie murphy photos aretha franklin photos south park  pictures homer simpson images bob dylan pictures elizabeth taylor photos madonna images saturday night live pictures willie nelson images hee haw pictures james brown images pete townshend photos tina turner pictures dixie chicks photos margaret thatcher photos guns n roses pictures paula abdul pictures jodie foster photos amy winehouse eminem frank sinatra photos van halen images satan blondie photos joni mitchell pictures merle haggard images rocky horror pictures monty python